chore: add triage/pending label to new issues (#24572)

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Gaudreault <alexandre_gaudreault@intuit.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Gaudreault
2025-09-15 16:38:46 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2bba563a76
commit 45c8fd9d2b
5 changed files with 19 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: 'bug'
labels: ['bug', 'triage/pending']
assignees: ''
---
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ assignees: ''
Checklist:
* [ ] I've searched in the docs and FAQ for my answer: https://bit.ly/argocd-faq.
* [ ] I've included steps to reproduce the bug.
* [ ] I've pasted the output of `argocd version`.
- [ ] I've searched in the docs and FAQ for my answer: https://bit.ly/argocd-faq.
- [ ] I've included steps to reproduce the bug.
- [ ] I've pasted the output of `argocd version`.
**Describe the bug**

View File

@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
name: Enhancement proposal
about: Propose an enhancement for this project
title: ''
labels: 'enhancement'
labels: ['enhancement', 'triage/pending']
assignees: ''
---
# Summary
What change you think needs making.
@@ -15,4 +16,4 @@ Please give examples of your use case, e.g. when would you use this.
# Proposal
How do you think this should be implemented?
How do you think this should be implemented?

View File

@@ -2,17 +2,17 @@
name: New Dev Tool Request
about: This is a request for adding a new tool for setting up a dev environment.
title: ''
labels: ''
labels: ['component:dev-env', 'triage/pending']
assignees: ''
---
Checklist:
* [ ] I am willing to maintain this tool, or have another Argo CD maintainer who is.
* [ ] I have another Argo CD maintainer who is willing to help maintain this tool (there needs to be at least two maintainers willing to maintain this tool)
* [ ] I have a lead sponsor who is a core Argo CD maintainer
* [ ] There is a PR which adds said tool - this is so that the maintainers can assess the impact of having this in the tree
* [ ] I have given a motivation why this should be added
- [ ] I am willing to maintain this tool, or have another Argo CD maintainer who is.
- [ ] I have another Argo CD maintainer who is willing to help maintain this tool (there needs to be at least two maintainers willing to maintain this tool)
- [ ] I have a lead sponsor who is a core Argo CD maintainer
- [ ] There is a PR which adds said tool - this is so that the maintainers can assess the impact of having this in the tree
- [ ] I have given a motivation why this should be added
### The proposer
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Checklist:
### Motivation
<!-- Why this tool would be useful to have in the tree. -->
<!-- Why this tool would be useful to have in the tree. -->
### Link to PR (Optional)

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
---
name: Security log
about: Propose adding security-related logs or tagging existing logs with security fields
title: "seclog: [Event Description]"
labels: security-log
assignees: notfromstatefarm
title: 'seclog: [Event Description]'
labels: ['security', 'triage/pending']
assignees: ''
---
# Event to be logged
Specify the event that needs to be logged or existing logs that need to be tagged.
@@ -16,4 +17,3 @@ What security level should these events be logged under? Refer to https://argo-c
# Common Weakness Enumeration
Is there an associated [CWE](https://cwe.mitre.org/) that could be tagged as well?

View File

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ applied to all new issues in our tracker.
If it is not yet possible to classify the bug, i.e. because more information is
required to correctly classify the bug, you should always set the label
`bug/in-triage` to make it clear that triage process has started but could not
`triage/pending` to make it clear that triage process has started but could not
yet be completed.
### Issue type